21 November 2008
Los Angeles Auto Show
 ENG   RUS   PT   ITA 
Photo Forum Articles News All news Feedback Advertising
Search the site:
USA openly plays sly games with Russian missiles   Killer UFOs hide in lakes   Badger attacks baby and eats its face
Example: Yushchenko, Putin, Bush

The front page   
 Russia   World   Society   Science   Hotspots and Incidents   Opinion   Business 

Login:
@pravda.ru
Password:
Forgot?
  Register Now!
Photo galleries
Russian Empress heart to be sold at auction
Russian Empress heart to be sold at auction
Animals and their teeth Winter is coming!









Article

Russia needs intelligent thinking, not intelligent design

25.01.2008 Source: Pravda.Ru
Increase font size
  Decrease font size   print version  
Pages: 12

I read Babu G. Ranganathan’s article in Pravda entitled Understanding Intelligent Design with mixed feelings. On the one hand, it’s nice to see free speech and a free press continue to develop in Russia. I greatly admire Pravda for having led the way. Everyone has a right to express opinions, even religious zealots and throw backs to the middle ages. Everyone has the right to be completely wrong again and again, even those who desperately cling to silly old ideas that comfort them and justify bigotry and sexism. I think even neo-fascists have the right to voice their loathsome ideology. But on the other hand, some ideas are downright dangerous and if they catch on, the world will be a much darker place. Intelligent design, which has been rightly ridiculed as “creationism in a tuxedo”, is, in my opinion, just that sort of ilk. Of course, the answer is that even the worst ideas should get a full hearing. Truth will out, as the British like to say, and I applaud Pravda for having the courage and wisdom to print everyone’s ideas.

Russia needs intelligent thinking, not intelligent design
Russia needs intelligent thinking, not intelligent design
BREAKING NEWS
America chooses its future
US Army’s Human Terrain System: Madness, Mayhem and Troughs of Cash
Ukraine angers Russia with its intention to join NATO
Diamonds - best friends for everyone, not just girls
More...

Although Ragnanathan’s article is about five pages long and sounds very scientific in places, it doesn’t contain much more than the same tired argument over and over again. Basically, he argues that even a single cell is so complex that it couldn’t possibly have happened all at once, all by itself. Such complexity obviously requires a creator. Well, of course that silly argument shouldn’t fool even a five year old because it doesn’t solve the problem. If a single cell is so complex that it needs a creator, then god, who not only thought up the idea of a cell, but allegedly listens to every prayer and every thought of every one of the six billion people on the planet, who keeps track of every hair on all our heads, every sparrow, and every bit of matter in the universe, must be infinitely MORE complex than a single cell! So where did god come from? Far from solving the problem, Ragnanathan’s “god “solution has made it much worse!! If Ragnanathan’s logic can’t imagine even a single cell popping in out of nowhere, how in the name of all wonder can it even entertain for a split second the possibility of god? That’s it for Ragnanathan. Eight ball in the side pocket!

Join Pravda.ru forum to experience freedom of speech

Digg!
Pages: 12
print version e-mail



Readers' Top
Extraterrestrials interested in human sperm and ovules
How Did We All Come From Adam and Eve?
Iraq war illegal – bring on the trial





All news About Pravda.Ru Site map Export news News partners STATISTICS
© 1999-2006. «PRAVDA.Ru». When reproducing our materials in whole or in part, hyperlink to PRAVDA.Ru should be made. The opinions and views of the authors do not always coincide with the point of view of PRAVDA.Ru's editors..
Rambler's Top100 Ðåéòèíã@Mail.ru